THE ECOWAS EFFICIENT LIGHTING STRATEGY DOCUMENTS
ECOWAS REGIONAL VALIDATION
WORKSHOP
FOR THE ECOWAS
EFFICIENT LIGHTING STRATEGY
DOCUMENTS
DRAFT REPORT
Dakar,
14- 15April 2014
I.
INTRODUCTION
- The Government of Senegal, and the
ECOWAS Regional Centre for Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency (ECREEE)
in collaboration with UNEP within framework of en.lighten initiative, with
the support of the SEEA-WA project of the EU Energy
Facility funded by the European Union, the Agency for
Environment and Energy Management (ADEME) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), organized a regional validation workshop for the
ECOWAS Efficient Lighting Strategy documents in the conference room of the
Radisson Hotel, Dakar, Senegal, from 14 to 15April, 2014.
- The objective of the workshop was
to review and adoptthe draft documents for the regional strategy on
efficient lighting.
- High-level experts of the Ministries of Energy from 14 ECOWAS Member
States attended the workshop, that is to say Benin, Burkina-Faso,
Capo-Verde, Ivory-Coast, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia,
Mali, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal and Togo, only Sierra-Leone was missing.
- The
followingregional and international organizations were represented as well
as the agencies and following companies:
·
The ECOWAS Commission
·
The UEMOA Commission
·
French Embassy in Senegal
·
Spanish Embassy in Senegal
·
The Alternative for Energy, Renewable
Energy and Environment (AERE- France)
·
The “Institut de la Francophonie pour le
Développement Durable” (IFDD)
·
The Environment and Development in the Third World (ENDA)
·
The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
·
The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
·
The
National Electricity Company of Senegal (SENELEC)
·
Agence pour l'Economie et la Maîtrise de l'Énergie (AEME-
Senegal)
·
ECOBANK in Senegal
·
African Development Bank
·
Association Sénégalaise de Normalisation
(ASN)
·
Agence Sénégalaise d’Electrification
Rurale (ASER)
·
Agence Nationale pour les Energies
Renouvelables (ANER- Senegal)
·
Group World leadership 2000
·
Private Sector, NGO, (SNV, Global
Off-grid Association)
The list of participants is attached to this
report as Annex 1.
II.
OPENING CEREMONY
5.
The
opening ceremony was opened by:
·
Mr.
Mahama Kappiah, Executive Director of the ECOWAS Centre for Renewable Energy
and Energy Efficiency (ECREEE).
·
Mr.
Gustavo MañezGomis, Project Manager of the UNEP-GEF en.lighten initiative
·
Mr.
HamadySy, Chief of Staff of Her Hon. Minister of Energy of Senegal
- Mr.
Mahama Kappiah, Executive Director of the ECOWAS Centre for Renewable
Energy and Energy Efficiency (ECREEE), thanked all the participants, and
in particular the UNEP-GEF en.lighten initiative. He also particularly
thanked the European Union for its support through the SEEA-WA project.
ECREEE’s partners are also thanked,ADEME, the AEA, the
UNDP and the Copper Alliance. He reminded the annual issues of efficient
lighting: 6.75% of the total consumption of electricity could be saved,
equivalent to 2.43 TWh, equivalent to 1,012.4 kilotons CO2 for
grid lighting and 11,362.4 kilotons of CO2 for off-grid
lighting. He also thanked the Honourable Ministry of Energy of Senegal for
the able and competent manner in which he championed the Efficient
Lighting Initiative.
- Mr. Gustavo MañezGomis, Project Manager of the
UNEP-GEF en.lighten initiative,thanked the participants, especially ECREEE,
for the energy deployed in conducting this project. He recalled the
economic difficulties related to power cuts in the region, the high cost
of fuel imports. However, the implementation of standards and regulations,
for instance banning of incandescent lamps, enables global economies. Two
countries were precursors to ban incandescent lamps: Cuba and Ghana. Other
countries have followed, such as the European Union and the United States
of America. UNEP is supporting a successful implementation in an integrated
approach, via the four pillars of the en.lighteninitiative strategy.
- Mr.HamadySy, Chief of Staff of Her Hon.
Minister of Energy of Senegal, thanked ECREEE for holding the workshop in
Dakar. He recalled the many energy challenges of ECOWAS, and in particular
the failure of Demand Side Management (DSM), he quoted that the cheapest
energy is the one we do not need to consume. In his letter for energy
policy, Senegal mentions the DSM as a policy to follow, for example with
the ban on the import and manufacturing of incandescent lamps. Nine (9) MW
peak have been avoided in Senegal, by replacing incandescent lamps with
energy-saving lamps. Actions are moving furtherwith grid as well as
off-grid lighting. The en.lighteninitiative approach is particularly interesting
because it takes into account the characteristics of each country. He
concluded by encouraging countries to create the conditions for transition
to efficient lighting.
III.
ELECTION OF BUREAU
- M. Ibrahim Soumaïlaof ECREEE recalled that
Senegal accepted to “Champion” the efficient lighting initiative,
therefore Senegal chaired the workshop.
- The
meeting proposed the following bureau to oversee the conduct of the
proceedings:
·
Chairman Mr. Ibrahima Niane, Director of Electricity,
Republic of Senegal
·
Rapporteurs Mr. KofiaduAgyarko,Republic of Ghana,
rapporteur
Mr. Loua Cécé Alexis, Republic of Guinea,
co-rapporteur
IV.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA
- The Agenda, attached as Annex 2, was
adopted.
V.
CONDUCT OF DELIBERATIONS
12.
Presentation of the ECOWAS
Regional Efficient Lighting Strategy context
13. Presentation
of ECREEE, onECOWAS Regional Efficient Lighting Strategy context
The fourpillars of the mandate of ECREEE are the followings ones:
·
political support
·
capacity strengthening
·
knowledge management
·
investment and business promotion.
The presentation underlined:
-
That the implementation of the six ECOWAS
Regional Efficient Initiatives have the potential to reduce the current energy
intensity of 0.56 ktoe/million US Dollars to 0.19 ktoe/million US Dollars
-
The Efficient Lighting Initiative is based on
four pillars: policies and tools of energy efficiency, capacities strengthening,
awareness raising, financing.
-
UNEP has selected the ECOWAS region as a
pilot region for its en.lighten Initiative. ECREE and UNEP have joined their
efforts, to prepare the conceptual note, estimate the potential, for energy
savings, avoided emissions and financial savings. This initiative was
officially launched in Accra, by the Ministry of Energy in Senegal, in October
2012.
-
Four thematic working groups have worked on
the four pillars of the en.lighten initiative (reference paragraph 10.2).
14. Presentation
of UNEP, on the en.ligthen initiative
The en.ligthen initiative is a private-public
partnership, to accelerate the market transformation, by setting up support
mechanism to phase-out incandescent lamps in 2016, through an integrated
approach, including guidelines, technical and political support, a lighting
toolkit, resources, a global efficient lighting centre.
The presentation underlines that:
-
in 2010, only few countries had banned
incandescent lamps. Four years later, 55 countries have joined the en.lighteninitiative,
others, without the support of the initiative, to work towards achieving the
same goals.
-
The approach is based on 4 pillars:
o
Minimal Energy Performance Standard,
o
Supporting Policies and Mechanisms,
o
Monitoring, Verification and Enforcement,
o
Environmentally Sound Management of efficient
lighting products.
-
For the 55 countries, the impact of the
savings is estimated at 80 TWhof electricity consumption saved, 35 Mt CO2emission
avoided and 7.5 billions US$ saved.
15.
Following the presentation, the participants thanked
ECREEE and UNEP.
16.
Presentation of the documenton
Efficient Lighting Strategy context
The main following objectives of the strategy document were presented:
·
Establish an integrated policy approach for
rapid and sustainable transition to efficient lighting in the ECOWAS region, by
2020, promoting the benefits of efficient lighting.
·
Harmonise the minimum energy performance
standards pertaining to energy efficiency on lighting, for both grid and
off-grid lighting, at regional level with the standardization process in ECOWAS
and at national level, with the publication of standards in the Official
Journals.
·
Implement agreements and regional, national
and international conventions on environment and climate change. The agreement
on a regional laboratory test implementation is an example; it will be
important to ensure the international accreditation of the laboratory.
·
Offer efficient lighting products for all, for
free or at a subsidized price, to carefully selected groups of actors who can
leverage action by promoting efficient technologies and sustainable lighting.
·
Use efficient lighting as an incentive to
manage electricity demand, as of today, without waiting, given the stakes.
17. Following the presentation, the
participants thanked the authors for the quality of the document and indicated
that the implementation of the strategy in the ECOWAS region could be a model
for other regions of sub-Saharan Africa. They then made pertinent observations.
Generally, they stressed, among others, the following:
a.
It
is requested to carefully include a definition of all terms, such as
"energy efficiency" in the document which will be sent to the ministers.
Similarly, if some countries find any errors or omissions in the information
about them, they are invited to send them to UNEP and ECREEE, as soon as
possible.
b. We need to ensure the sound
management of end of life cycle of products, their collection and recycling,
particularly for mercury lamps, collection and recycling must be organized as
soon as possible.
c. A question was asked about the threshold
for switching cycle duration of 6000 hours for the standard, which seems too
high. The risk is the development of an informal market with cheaper products,
which would require more control and would increase the price. Similarly, the
level of selected thresholds is questioned, as the treatment of power factor.
d. What will become ofthe current
standards in place in some countries? What will be the process for countries
that adopt standards for LEDs?
e. With regards to capacity for
testing, questions were raised about the relevance of national laboratories,
the regional laboratory and its location.
f. Impacts on the market were
discussed, as well as the distribution of free lamps or subsidized ones, whichcould
distort the market. Other running projects have been reminded.
g. The policy for monitoring compliance
of products entering or manufactured (nowadays or in the future) in each
country and the policy for assessing compliance are not deployed, except in a
few countries such as Ghana. Control of markets must be strengthened.
18.
Clarification
elements were given to the previous comments and questions of participants,
especially on the following points:
·
The
proposed mercury level is quite low, it is aligned with the EU level, currently
2.5 mg. The exposure to a broken lamp in a local is close to zero, but
precautionary measures will have to be secured within collection centers and
treatment centers. This is an opportunity for all countries to launch a sector
of activities for collection and recycling organization.
·
For
the regional standards, if they exist, they apply instead of national
standards, to encourage the market development between the countries and
protect the region against banned products for other international markets.
·
The
laboratory must receive international accreditation. Accreditation is granted
for three years. As prices of building, training and maintenance of
laboratories are high, its accreditation is a complex and costly issue;
therefore it is necessary to work in conjunction with ECOWAS. If local
initiatives are successful, one has to foster synergies by promoting
cooperation and knowledge sharing between countries.
·
Dissemination
of lamps will not go only through free or subsidized distribution, other
mechanisms exist, but distribution to targeted public may have an important
leverage on the use of efficient lamps.
19.
Presentation of the Implementation Program of the draft Regional
Efficient Lighting Strategy
20. The validation process of the
strategy was reminded. The presentation of the implementation plan has focused
on the following four pillars, with the identification of future actions:
a.
Minimum Energy
Performance Standards
Three tasks are identified, to finalise the adoption of the MEPS, that
is to say national consultations, standardisation process at the regional level
of ECOWAS, and adoption of harmonized MEPS for the ECOWAS.
b.
Supporting
Policies and Mechanisms
Two tasks are identified. On one side, on awareness, for general public
and targeted groups of stakeholders, on the other side, to demonstrate the
interest of efficient lighting, through free or subsidized distribution,
financial schemes development, bulk purchase, equipment of social housing.
At regional and national level, will be implemented too mandatory
labelling and harmonized standards, then public awareness.It is about setting
up compulsory labelling and harmonised certification through the development of
a technical regulation.
c.
Monitoring,
Verification and Enforcement
National registry on lighting products will be set up, in order to
monitor the products entering and manufactured in the ECOWAS region. The laboratory
for test will become operational in 2016.
d.
Environmentally
Sound Management
Dissemination on the benefit of Environmentally
Sound Management should be conducted
and collection and recycling system should be established.
21. After presentation
of the Implementation Program of the draft strategy,
participants underlined following points.
a. It
is recommended to governments and local authorities to prescribe regulation or
standards on efficient lighting for the public markets.
b. Work
with the other programs, such as Lighting Africa and the Global Off-Grid
Lighting Association, should be based on cooperation, should avoid the
duplication of studies and standards. The aim is to define a standard together
and to facilitate the market development.
c. Fiscal
instrumentis one of the mechanisms that can be used. To choose the country for
the laboratory, several criteria are reminded: its access and its easiness, the
customs authorisation, the exemption of import taxes, the political stability.
d. Standards
should go with good information dissemination.
It
was said that what is implemented has been approved by the heads of state, when
regional standards will be implemented, they will be applied. It is important
to promote what already exists. One should not forget that the current work is
participating to the creation of a regional market. Regional standards will replace
national standards.
e. Several
details have been asked. It was asked to specifyall thekey stakeholders involved,
such as the Ministry of Finance from which custom agencies depends. Also, a
calendar for budget, of the different financing resources would complete the
document. It was also asked, and agreed;that private companies or banks should
not be mentioned. Howewer taken into account environmental and social risks, in
projects financing is an analysis to promote.
22.
Presentation of the budget of implementation actions
The implementation schedule and the budget were
presented. A number of assumptionshave been taken into account to estimate the
budget. For
every activity the strategy specifies if it should be a national or a regional
activity. Additionally an idea of the frequency for the consultation and how
much it would cost based on the country’s population was provided. Overall the
cost of activities will be 295.19 million USD with the most important cost
being beard by national governments for national activities (270.18 million USD)
and by regional institutions for regional activities (25.01 million USD). He further
emphasized that a regional recycling facility should be led by the private
sector.
23.
Following the deliberations, the experts moved to adopt the strategy
document, subject to the integration of the remarks and comments of the
participants. The comments and remarks to be integrated in the document of
strategy include the following:
·
Define
the technical terminologies of the document;
·
Raise
awareness in countries, through the strategy, on technological changes of
lighting products;
·
Integrate
LEDs in the standard project, and in the strategy;
·
Justify
the creation of a regional laboratory;
·
Indicate
basic data, used to calculate lighting energy efficiency;
·
Rephrase
the financing chapter, without mention of specific actors, except if necessary;
·
Complete
the criteria to choose the regional laboratory location, for instance with
criteria on custom and fiscal facilities;
·
Reduce
MVE cost for the establishment (installation and commissioning) of laboratories
to 5 millions USD only, including both national and regional laboratories;
·
Encourage
countries to finance and support the implementation of actions from the
Initiative, this will secure the financing of donors;
·
Update
regularly the strategy, enlarge it for other consuming sectors (public
lighting, commercial buildings…).
- Discussion on
potential financing to implement the strategy
VI.
RECOMMENDATIONS
- The meeting of
experts, hold in Dakar, Senegal, 14 and 15 April 2015, after analysis and
comments, has validated the document of the ECOWAS Strategy for Efficient
Lighting and it recommends:
·
Recommendation 1 - ECREEE will prepare a resolution
relating to the ECOWAS Efficient Lighting Strategy for the adoption during the
ECOWAS Energy Ministers Meeting.
·
Recommendation 2 - During the Energy
Ministers meeting, adopt the document on efficient lighting strategy and the
actions plan for implementation, annexed to this report.
·
Recommendation 3 – The ECOWAS Commission,
ECREEE, UNEP en.lighten Initiative and other partners involved in this initiative
are invited to make the necessary efforts to mobilize financing to support the
implementation of the Strategy at the Regional and National levels.
·
Recommendation 4 – The private sector and
the civil society organisations will work together, following the guidelines
from the states on the component related to the creation of awareness on environmentally
sound disposal of used products.
VII.
CLOSING CEREMONY
- Mr. Gustavo
MañezGomis, Project Manager of the UNEP-GEF en.lighten initiative, thanked
the different participants, and specifically ECREEE for the work done
since one year. He underlined the opportunities for the countries, created
by the Efficient Lighting Initiative. He insisted the interest to work at
the regional level, the 15 countries together. Initiative will be soon
transferred to the ministries, than translated in standards. He concluded
with its reviewing each three years and its enlargement to other sectors.
- Mr. Mahama
Kappiah, Executive Director of the ECOWASCentre for Renewable Energy and
Energy Efficiency (ECREEE) thanked the participants, and specifically
Senegal, the champion for the Efficient Lighting Initiative.
- M. Ibrahim
Niane, Director of Electricity of Energy Ministry in Senegal, in his
closing remarks, thanked the participants for their valuable contributions
during the deliberations and for the spirit of friendly atmosphere which
prevailed during the workshop. He also forwarded the congratulations of
her Honorable Minister for Energy and Mines of Senegal. He advised
everyone to carefully implement the actions plan for efficient lighting. Thereafter,
he declared the meeting closed and wished all the participants a safe
journey back to their respective destinations.
DONE AT DAKAR,
THE15thAPRIL 2014
Mr.Ibrahima
NIANE
Republic Of Senegal
The Chairman Of Experts
Validation Workshop
LIST OF ANNEXES
Annex 1
List of Participants
Annex 2
Workshop Agenda
Annex
3
Vote
Of Thanks
Annex
4
List
of Acronyms
ANNEX3
VOTE OF
THANKS
PARTICIPANTS OF THE ECOWAS REGIONAL VALIDATION
WORKSHOP FOR THE ECOWASEFFICIENT LIGHTING STRATEGY DOCUMENT EXPRESSED THEIR
SINCERE THANKS TO THE GOVERNMENT OF SENEGAL FOR HIS WELCOME AND HOSPITALITY
DURING THEIR STAY AND ESPECIALLY FOR EXCELLENT WORKING CONDITIONS THAT MAKES
THE SUCCESS OF THIS WORKSHOP.
ANNEX4
LIST OF ACRONYMS
ADEME Agence de l'Environnement et de la Maîtrise de l'Energie,
France
AEA Agence Autrichienne
de l’Energie
AERE Alternatives pour
l’Energie, les énergies Renouvelables et l’Environnement
AEME Agence de l’Economie et
de la Maîtrise de l’Energie
ANER Agence
Nationale pour les Energies Renouvelables
ASER Agence sénégalaise d’électrification rurale
BAD Banque Africaine de
Développement
DSM Demand Side
Management
ECOWAS Economic
Community Of West African States
ECREEE ECOWAS Centre for Renewable
Energy and Energy Efficiency
EE Energy
Efficiency
EEEP ECOWAS
Energy Efficiency Policy
ENDA
TM Environment
and Development in the Third World (Environnement et Développement du Tiers
Monde)
ESCO Energy
service company
EU European
Union
IFDD Institut
de la Francophonie pour le Développement Durable
NAMA Nationally
Appropriate Mitigation Actions
SEAD Super-efficient
Equipment and Appliance Deployment
SEEA-WA Supporting
Energy Efficiency for Access in West Africa
SE4ALL Sustainable
Energy for All Initiative
UNEP United
Nations for Environmental Program
UNDP United
Nations for Development Program
Source :
Expert Représentant – Atelier Régional de Validation du Document de la
Stratégie Régionale de la CEDEAO sur l’Eclairage Efficace, les 14 et 15 Avril
2014 à Dakar / Sénégal
Groupe WLD 2000 / Cabinet CPEE / Volet Information & Communication
Durables
Adresse: CP 13522, BP
37171 Dakar Grand Yoff / Sénégal
Tel: + 221 77 218 04 08 (Direct
Services Recouvrement) /+ 221 77 539 47 35 / +221 76 679 70 23 / +221
70 780 83 28;
E-mail : groupe.worldleadership2000@gmail.com
worldleadership_2000@yahoo.fr
recouvrementcbis@gmail.com
Notre savoir – faire,
Notre Stratégie du Faire- Faire, Notre Approche Compétences (APC), Notre
Approche Intégrée Droits de l’Homme (AIDH),
pour vous satisfaire.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home